Miller Todd Coal Co. v. Adrian Fuel Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Judge:
Determination of the challenges of a bill and answer is the purpose of this certification. The bill in part and the answer in its entirety were held insufficient on demurrer.
The primary object of the bill is to enforce against the large acreage of coal of Adrian Fuel Company, hereinafter called defendant, ,the liens of three judgments against the defendant purchased by the plaintiff in March, 1938. With respect tó all matters pertaining to the liens of these judgments, the allegations of the bill were properly held sufficient by the trial chancellor.
But there is another feature…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Camden v. Fink Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Frantz Coal Land Co. v. Ansted National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
- Lay v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- Traugh v. HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford v. Buffalo Eagle Colliery Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Condor One, Inc. v. Homestead Partners, Ltd. (In Re Homestead Partners, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- In The Matter Of Natchez Corporation Of West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Lilly v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In re Natchez Corp. of West Virginia)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992