Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Lake City Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

From a finding for the defendant by three lawyer-arbitrators the plaintiffs appealed to the court of common pleas pursuant to §27 of the Arbitration Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 715, as amended by the Act of March 15, 1956, P. L. 1279, §1, 5 PS §71. The appeal was quashed because of the appellants’ failure to pay the defendant’s bill of costs. Later the court reinstated the appeal as to the claim of the minor because the appeal of a minor may not be conditioned upon payment of costs. Arbitration Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 715, §31, 5 PS §76. The parents, in their appeal to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bertinelli v. GaloniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Hartley v. WeidemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Fife v. the Great A. & P. Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Murray's Executors v. SharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  5. De Benneville v. De BennevilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1803

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleisher v. KaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Cramer v. Zeigler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1965
  3. Fleisher v. KaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API