Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 7, 1994No. Court No. 92-03-00163PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Timken Company (“Timken”), challenges certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, Interna*943tional Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final results of administrative review of certain tapered roller bearings (“TRBs”) from Japan. Tapered Roller Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (“Final Results”), 57 Fed. Reg. 4,975 (Feb. 11, 1992).
Background
In 1987, Commerce published an antidumping duty order on TRBs from Japan. Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Allied-Signal Aerospace Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- The Ad Hoc Committee of Az-Nm-Tx-Fl Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. The United States, Cemex S.A., and Apasco, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Thai Pineapple Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Jtekt Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009