Legal Opinion

Mississippi Valley Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1961No. 18501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The Petitioner, Mississippi Valley Gas Company, herein called Mississippi, brings before us for review an order of the Federal Power Commission as authorized by Section 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 717r(b). Mississippi is a distributor of natural gas which it purchases under contract from United Gas Pipe Line Company, herein called United. It has intervened in these proceedings. Both Mississippi and United are natural gas companies within the terms of the Natural Gas Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 717a(6). There are two rate schedules applicable to the purchases by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. BerghSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Gas Service Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  5. Pacific Natural Gas Co., a Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grover C. Kay v. The Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Grover C. Kay v. The Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine HallattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Maryland Casualty Company v. Harry H. Hallatt and Mary Valentine HallattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API