Legal Opinion

German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 31, 1996No. 93 Civ. 6941 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Lead Industries Association Inc., NL Industries, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company, The Sherwin-Williams Company, SCM Corporation, The Glidden Company and The O’Brien Corporation (collectively, the “manufacturer defendants”) have moved for recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 (“Section 455”), based on their intent to raise, as a defense to cross-claims brought by defendant the City of New York (“the City”), the City’s policy regarding lead paint poisoning between 1967 and 1969, at which time I served as Deputy Mayor of the City. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. RoebuckDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API