Legal Opinion

Village of Lakewood v. Russell

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This is an application for a peremptory mandamus order.

Petitioner village asks that respondent, James A. Russell, be directed to deliver to the clerk of the village all books, records, etc., of the village which are in his possession.

The parties to this proceeding concede that there is no dispute of any material fact alleged in the petition and that as only questions of law are presented a peremptory mandamus order must issue or the petition be dismissed.

Respondent was on the 6th day of April, 1936, duly appointed treasurer of the village of Lakewood for a two-year term by the board of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Capobianco v. Inc. Village of Massapequa ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Village of Lakewood v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API