Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams v. Bozarth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1978No. 77-1385PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent judge asserts basically that a declaratory judgment proceeding is the only method by which the applicant can test the Director’s regulations without jeopardy of a fine and that R. C. Chapter 3745 did not oust common pleas courts of their jurisdiction in a declaratory judgment proceeding in this area.

These assertions ignore the administrative scheme of R. C. Chapter 3745 which gives the applicant adequate access to judicial review. Due process and equal protection are afforded the applicant under this scheme.

R. C. 3745.04 provides that:

“Any person who was a party to a proceeding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herrick v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Cincinnati ex rel. Crotty v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Brown v. Rockside Reclamation, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Maynard v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Warren Molded Plastics, Inc. v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Rocky Ridge, L.L.C. v. Winters (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Tyler v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API