Standard Brands Paint Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1.
The State Compensation Fund sought review by certiorari of the respondent Commission’s decision upon review affirming an award granting reopening in favor of the respondent employee, Sweet. The Fund maintains that there was no evidence to support a reopening based upon a new, additional or previously undiscovered condition or disability causally related to the industrial injury, and that therefore the Commission was without jurisdiction to act as it did.
The respondent had sustained a compen-sable injury to his back arising out of and in the course of his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Davila v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Scott v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Arizona State Welfare Department v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bayless v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Garrote v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Perry v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Magma Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Mejia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.