Legal Opinion
Glover v. County of Charleston
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 6, 2004No. 25904PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice WALLER:
Appellants, 1 property owners in Charleston County, brought this action alleging the County’s newly implemented Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) effectively re-zoned their property, depriving them of due process and equal protection, and resulting in a taking of their property without just compensation. The trial court granted summary judgment to respondents (collectively County). We affirm.
FACTS
In 1994, the General Assembly passed the South Carolina Local Government Comprehensive Planning Enabling Act of 1994 requiring local governments to develop a comprehensive planning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Cunningham v. Helping Hands, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005