Szczeklik v. Markel International Insurance
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 12) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 15). Because the undisputed evidence reveals that Markel International Insurance Company, Limited (“Markel”) wrongfully refused to defend and indemnify Neubert Aero Corp. (“Neubert”) in connection with certain underlying litigation brought by George Szczeklik and Marta Szczeklik (the “Plaintiffs”), Plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
Introduction
The issue in this case is whether Markel had a duty to defend…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Evanston Insurance v. Gaddis Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Kolbek v. Truck Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Diamond State Insurance v. Boys' Home Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Southern-Owners Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- Clear Blue Insurance Company v. Gemini Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.