Legal Opinion

(PC) Lipsey v. Reddy

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 17, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01434Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr., No. 2:17-cv-1434-KJM-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 REDDY, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. After filing his fourth amended complaint – which was served on Ortiz, Smith, 19 and Reddy - defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings as to plaintiff’s California 20 Government Claims Act, arguing that he had failed to allege compliance with the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API