Legal Opinion
James A. Frazier and Mantis Wildlife Films v. Roessel Cine Photo Tech
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 2, 2005No. 2004-1060PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LINN.
Concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
LINN, Circuit Judge.
James Frazier (“Frazier”) appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California’s (“district court”) judgment that held U.S. Patent No. 5,727,236 (“the ’236 patent”) unenforceable for inequitable conduct and awarded attorney fees based on its finding that this case is exceptional. Frazier v. Roessel Cine Photo Tech, Inc., No. CV 99-10425 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 9, 2003) (“Inequitable Conduct Opinion”); Frazier v. Roessel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. A.B. Chance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Eisai Co., Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Tafas v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Sensormatic Electronics Corp. v. TAG CO. US, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.