Department of Ecology v. Theodoratus
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting) — The majority correctly frames the question as whether a final certificate of water right may be issued based upon the capacity of a public water system under the “pumps and pipes” approach, but incorrectly says “no” based upon its interpretation of RCW 90.03.290, a statute which provides: “When an application *601. . . has been filed ... it shall be [the Department of Ecology’s] duty to . . . determine to what beneficial use or uses it can be applied.” In so holding the majority confuses “beneficial use” with “actual use” and ignores other statutory provisions which are indicative…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.