Legal Opinion

Jones v. Pizon

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 29, 2018No. Appeal No. 2017AP2024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHagedorn, J.

¶ 1 A jury concluded that Raymond Jones, Sr., was incompetent when he entered into two contracts to sell real estate to Brian Pizon. Pizon appeals from a judgment invalidating the transfers on several grounds. Most notably, he argues that incompetency to enter a contract must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, not by the greater weight of the credible evidence as the jury was instructed. Pizon also takes issue with the court's decision to allow certain testimony regarding Jones' competence and the court's denial of a motion for mistrial. We find no error in the proceedings and affirm.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. State v. WalbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Nommensen v. American Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eclipse Service Inc v. LehnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API