Legal Opinion

Wingard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 1968No. 68-25PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner is appealing from the summary denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 motion. In order to obtain post-conviction relief under Rule No. 1 (now R.Cr.P. 1.850, 33 F.S.A.), it is necessary that one seeking such relief be in custody by virtue of the sentence appealed from. An appeal from a judgment denying a motion for post-conviction relief under Rule No. 1 becomes moot upon completion of the service of the sentence. Desrosiers v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 834; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Young v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 622. It appears from the record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Desrosiers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Henzel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API