Legal Opinion

Grotte v. Nagle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1897No. 6972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendants in error (hereinafter styled the plaintiffs) commenced this action against the plaintiff in error (hereinafter designated defendant) in the district court of Douglas county to recover the sum of $-, alleged to be the plaintiffs’ due as the result of certain business transactions between the parties. An affidavit was filed and a writ of attachment procured to issue, which was levied on a stock of liquors, etc., as property of the defendant. After issues joined the case was referred, and the referee heard the testimony and filed his report, and, subsequently, what was known in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sauter v. LeveridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Snyder v. HarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. C. Aultman & Co. v. DaggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Tessier v. Lockwood Englehart & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hart v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Insurance Company of North America v. KuninNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Josey v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Nagle v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API