Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1990No. 1657 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. O’Connell, 521 Pa. 242, 555 A.2d 873 (1989), recently held that because of the confusion arising out of situations in which an arrestee receives contemporaneous recitals of Miranda warnings and the implied consent law, Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547, an arrestee who requests to speak with or to call an attorney or anyone else, in response to a police request to take a breathalyzer test, must be instructed not only that his license will be suspended for one year if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. FerraraCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. King v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Northampton, Bucks County Municipal Authority v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API