Legal Opinion

Fee v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 7, 1992No. A-3868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

Ted Pee was convicted upon his plea of no contest of the charge of refusing to submit to a chemical test of his breath. AS 28.35.032(f). He reserved his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence of his alleged refusal to take the Intoximeter test. See Oveson v. Anchorage, 574 P.2d 801, 803 n. 4 (Alaska 1978); Cooksey v. State, 524 P.2d 1251 (Alaska 1974).

Fee was arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI), AS 28.35.030, by Alaska State Trooper William McKillop. McKillop took Fee to the Palmer trooper station, where he asked Fee to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Graham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Alex Trenton Beltz v. State of Alaska, State of Alaska v. Lesli Renee RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024
  3. Snyder v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API