Legal Opinion

Bates v. Barclay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1972No. 7335PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Upon the basis of a jury verdict, the trial court denied the plaintiffs a recovery and this appeal follows. Because of the number of individuals involved, we will speak of the parties by their surnames.

A Chevrolet automobile driven by Paul Entrekin collided with a Ford car being driven by James Barclay. Barclay and Mr. and Mrs. Archie Jones, passengers in the Barclay vehicle, were killed instantly. Entrekin and his passenger, Joseph Bates, both received serious injuries.

The survivors of Mr. and Mrs. Jones brought suit against Entrekin, Barclay’s Estate, and Barclay’s employer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bolstad v. EglesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Polasek v. QuiniusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Garza v. San Antonio Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trailways, Inc. v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  2. Rogers v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. O'NEILL v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. P.T. & E. Co. v. Beasley, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1985
  5. Reed v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API