Legal Opinion

TONYA M. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2007No. S149248PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

When a child is removed from parental custody and made a dependent of the court, reunification services generally must be provided to the child’s parents. At a six-month review hearing, the court must decide whether to continue or terminate those services. In doing so, should the court consider the likelihood of reunification during the next six months after the hearing, or the likelihood of reunification in such time as remains until a potential 12-month review hearing, even if less than six months? (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e).) We conclude the latter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. GoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Nolan W.California Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. In Re Corrine W.California Supreme Court · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API