Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Garcia
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided February 28, 1991No. 13-89-140-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
Appeal is taken from the granting of two motions for summary judgment and the denial of one motion for partial summary judgment. Appellants, the Robinsons, sued attorney Ramon Garcia for breach of fiduciary duty, violations of the Canons of Professional Responsibility, and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that Garcia failed to properly distribute the proceeds of a settlement agreement. The Robinsons joined Texas Commerce Bancshares, allegedly the stakeholder of the funds. Bancshares and Garcia each moved for summary judgment. Both motions…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Archer v. GriffithTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Reagan v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Metromarketing Services, Inc. v. HTT Headwear, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Long v. NCNB-Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Garcia v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Acierno v. Worthy Brothers Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Burke Co. v. Hilton Development Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.