Romines v. Donald Maggi, Inc.

BILLINGS, Judge.

Plaintiffs sued defendant for property damage allegedly resulting from blasting operation conducted by defendant near property owned by plaintiffs. Trial was to a jury and plaintiffs contend the verdict form was incomplete and the court erroneously received the verdict and entered judgment for defendant. We affirm.

The parties have filed an agreed statement as to the record on appeal, pursuant to Rule 81.13, V.A.M.R. The pertinent part of the record is as follows:

“After deliberating forty-five minutes, the jury returned to the courtroom with Verdict form A on which someone had…