Legal Opinion

Denman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897No. 7395PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Saunders county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action by Denman against the railroad company to recover for loss suffered by reason of delay in the transportation of certain cattle for the plaintiff. The suit was originally brought in the county court, apparently against the Burlington & Missouri River Railroad in Nebraska. An amended petition was filed against *141the defendant company, which appeared to the action. This amended petition was filed December 9,1892, which date we must accept as that of the commencement of the action against this defendant. The canse was appealed to the district court, and the petition…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. The Henry W. BreyerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  2. Cram v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Nelson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Haurigan v. Chigago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Sevier v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API