Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Supervisors of Sanilac County

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus.

1Per curiam

This is an application to compel the respondents to observe the law in equalizing the valuation of their respective townships for the purposes of a levy of State and county taxes for the year. The application makes a strong showing that in making their assessments a few of the supervisors had obeyed the law and assessed property at its cash value, while the *73others had refused. In response to an order to show cause, the several supervisors who were accused of having made assessments at a fraction only of what they believe'd to be the real cash value, have come in with affidavits in which they…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Danforth v. LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Olympia Water Works v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pioneer Iron Co. v. City of NegauneeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McDonald v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Auditor General v. Wayne County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API