Attorney General v. Supervisors of Sanilac County
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus.
1Per curiam
This is an application to compel the respondents to observe the law in equalizing the valuation of their respective townships for the purposes of a levy of State and county taxes for the year. The application makes a strong showing that in making their assessments a few of the supervisors had obeyed the law and assessed property at its cash value, while the *73others had refused. In response to an order to show cause, the several supervisors who were accused of having made assessments at a fraction only of what they believe'd to be the real cash value, have come in with affidavits in which they…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Danforth v. LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Olympia Water Works v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Pioneer Iron Co. v. City of NegauneeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- McDonald v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Auditor General v. Wayne County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.