Legal Opinion

State v. Lyman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 1995No. 10-93-02538; CA A83328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant moves for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Lyman, 133 Or App 600, 891 P2d 24 (1995), which affirmed without opinion her conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. We allow the motion, vacate the judgment of conviction and remand for further proceedings.

Before trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence seized by police officers who had visited her apartment building to investigate a landlord-tenant dispute. The evidence showed that upstairs tenants had spoken with the officers and then ushered them down to the ground floor level,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. CoughennowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API