Legal Opinion

State v. Sowell, 06ap-443 (6-30-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2008No. 06AP-443PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Shawn Lamar Sowell, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding him guilty of murder, with a firearm specification, following a jury trial. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

{¶ 2} Appellant was indicted on one count of aggravated murder, in violation of R.C. 2903.01, with a firearm specification. Appellant pled not guilty and the case was tried to a jury. Appellee presented the following evidence.

{¶ 3} Ahman Fares testified on behalf of appellee as follows. Fares worked as a cashier at Kelly's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. GravelyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. DennisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. BelcherOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Columbus v. Bishop, 08ap-300 (12-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API