Legal Opinion
Scott v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 23, 2007No. 07-216CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument and supplemental briefing on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has protested a solicitation for Reconstruction Support Security Services in Iraq as a violation of the Anti-Pinkerton Act, 5 U.S.C. § 3108 (2000), and 48 C.F.R. (FAR) § 37.109 (2006). Defendant challenges plaintiffs qualifications as an “interested party” with standing to maintain this protest, even with all allegedly illegal provisions removed. These provisions that defendant agrees to sanitize for purposes of its motion…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Myers Investigative and Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Rex Service Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blackwater Lodge & Training Center, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Benchmade Knife Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Erinys Iraq Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.