Legal Opinion

Ribando v. Silhouette Optical, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 21, 1994No. 94 Civ. 5155 (VLB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

This diversity of citizenship suit was originally brought by plaintiff, an executive of the defendant Silhouette Optical Ltd., on the ground that his employer improperly fired him for accepting an elective position as may- or of a locality in New York.

Defendants have moved to dismiss the now-pending second amended complaint, which adds allegations of violations of New York’s Human Rights Law (Executive Law 298-a), its whistleblower law (Labor Law 740), New York Election Law Article 17, and the New York and federal Constitutions.

Defendants’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Gompers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API