Legal Opinion

Johnson-Romaker v. Kroger Ltd. Partnership One

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 4, 2009No. Case 3:07CV3271PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a case about alleged employment discrimination. Plaintiff, Audrey Johnson-Romaker alleges that defendant, Kroger Limited Partnership One [Kroger], violated Title VII and O.R.C. § 1112.99. She claims Kroger denied her cross-training opportunities and terminated her employment due to racial discrimination and in retaliation for complaining to the regional store manager of racist comments made by co-workers. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1881.

Pending is Kroger’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 24] on all of JohnsonRomaker’s claims: 1) Title VII…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Shelby CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
  2. Gibbs v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Howse v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, TNDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. Nagarajan v. HargroveDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API