Legal Opinion

Sholes v. Citizens State Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 24, 1927No. 11,700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The bank brought this action against Sholes for the possession of live stock and had verdict and judgment. Sholes brings error.

The stock was claimed by virtue of a chattel mortgage. The defendant moved to make the complaint more definite and certain; the motion was denied, which is assigned as error, but defendant answered which waived the motion. That the objection by demurrer for indefiniteness is waived by answering over is provided by Code 1921, sec. 61, and we have many times so held. There can be no substantial reason why the motion for the same cause should not be waived in like manner.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurd v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
  2. Giano v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. Enright v. Midland Sampling & Ore Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Saunders v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. Deutsch v. RohlfingColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Fidelity Hail Insurance v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Moshannon Nat. Bank v. Iron Mountain Ranch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Chain O'Mines, Inc. v. LewisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API