Legal Opinion

Stirk v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. Of New York

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1952No. 4470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the beneficiary of five insurance policies from a judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company in an action on the double indemnity feature of each of said policies.

The face of each of the policies provided for double indemnity “upon receipt of due proof that such death resulted from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, all upon the conditions set forth in Section 1, * * * Section 1 entitled “Double Indemnity” on the second page of the policies further provided that double indemnity would be payable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. O'Neill v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'NEILL v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Rushing v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API