Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Domino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 14, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLene, J.

Having twice been convicted of rape of a child, the defendant is a sex offender subject to the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act, G. L. c. 6, §§ 178C-178P (sex offender registration act or act). Following his release from prison in early 2008, and prior to having been assigned a final classification level by the Sexual Offender Registry Board (SORB), the defendant registered with SORB, listing as his permanent address a relative’s apartment where he in fact did not reside. He subsequently pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to register as a sex…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. BerriosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. BrunetMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API