Bigelsen v. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Presiding Judge.
This appeal requires us to clarify the application of the statutory scheme for discipline of physicians who are licensed by both the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners (“BOMEX”) and the Arizona Board of Homeopathic Examiners (“Homeopathic Board”). Specifically, we must decide whether Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) sections 32-1407 and 32-2907 bar BOMEX from investigating and taking disciplinary action against Harvey Bigelsen, M.D., a dual-licensed physician, when the Homeopathic Board has already investigated and dismissed the same complaints.
We hold that because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Globe American Casualty Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Murphy v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Save Our Valley Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Child v. Foxboro Ranch Estates, LLC (In re Child)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.