Legal Opinion

Isaac McLean Sons Co. v. William S. Butler & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 6, 1913No. 396 EquityPublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Isaac McLean Sons Company against William S. Butler & Company, Incorporated. In the matter of Gilchrist Company. On intervening petitions of Chimney G. Shaw and Enoch E. Fletcher.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, Circuit Judge.

Each petitioner had a contract with the Gilchrist Company. Shaw’s was in writing, dated July 2,1912. Fletcher’s was oral, hut its terms are evidenced, as is agreed, by an unsigned draft produced in evidence. It also dates from July 2, 1912. Under these contracts the parties had acted for several weeks preceding November 7. 1912, tlie date upon which receivers were appointed in the above-entitled case of the Gilchrist Company and its assets.

On November 7, 1912, the Gilchrist Company stood charged on its own books for amounts due die petitioners on account of sales made in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pratt v. TuttleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Lord's, Inc., Bankrupt. Chicago Cutter-Karcher, Inc. v. Charles D. Maley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. Harvey Brokerage Co. v. Ambassador Hotel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  3. In Re Martin'sDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  4. In the Matter of Lord's, Inc., Bankrupt. Chicago Cutter-Karcher, Inc. v. Charles D. Maley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API