Legal Opinion · Dissent
Peggy Z. Coyne v. Scott Walker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 2016No. 2013AP000416Published
1DissentAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
¶ 235. (dissenting). I join the dissent authored by Chief Justice Roggensack because I agree that, based on the arguments raised in this case, the respondents have failed to establish that the provisions of 2011 Wisconsin Act 21 ("Act 21") at issue are unconstitutional *553beyond a reasonable doubt as applied to the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("SPI"). I write to emphasize a few points.
¶ 236. First, there are numerous significant areas of agreement between the lead opinion and Chief Justice Roggensack's dissent. Most importantly, the lead opinion and the dissent agree that the Wisconsin…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.