Legal Opinion

Stecher v. London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd., of London, England

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1931No. 29,910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*90The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action to recover upon an accident policy for being struck by lightning, with the usual requirement that the bodily injuries sustained be through accidental means, directly and independently of all other causes. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff.

Defendant insurance company appeals, assigning as error the overruling of objections to the use and form of certain hypothetical questions asked by plaintiff, the overruling of the demurrer to evidence of plaintiff, the giving and refusal to give certain instructions and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wallach v. WylieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Sly v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Yard v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Moore v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. William Deering & Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Bell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Riggs v. GouldnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Stockham v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Son v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API