Legal Opinion

City of Oswego v. Montcalm Dock Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.

In the harbor of the city of Oswego, as it existed when this condemnation proceeding was instituted in 1931, there existed an artificial island which the Federal government desired to remove in order to improve the harbor. The city of Oswego, for the purpose of securing for the Federal government the right to remove this island, on March 30, 1931, instituted this proceeding under the provisions of the Condemnation Law, alleging in its petition the ownership of' the island by the defendant. The defendant at once interposed an answer to the petition which amounted to an admission of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Matter of the Application of Cooper, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Davidsburgh v. . Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Bush v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Bell Telephone Co. v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lang v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Decker v. People, New York County Courts1959
  3. Greenberg v. New York City Planning CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Podolsky v. Narnoc Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Chamberlin v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API