Legal Opinion
Podolsky v. Narnoc Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*840OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Oshrin, J.
Petitioner, Stuart Podolsky, seeks reargument of the order of this court dated March 12th, 1991, which denied his application pursuant to Lien Law § 10 (1) and § 19 (6) summarily discharging a lien of record (see, Matter of Podolsky v Narnoc Corp., 149 Misc 2d 834). Respondent, Narnoc Corp., has filed a cross motion seeking permission to extend the lien pursuant to Lien Law § 19. The application seeking reargument is granted, and upon reargument the original decision is adhered to, and the application seeking permission to extend the notice of lien is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- La Porto v. Village of PhilmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Selzer v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Windsor Plumbing Supply Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Northport Marina Associates v. J.M. Cashman, Inc. (In Re Northport Marina Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Rakowsky v. Excelsior 57th Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1995