In Re Fritz
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the Supreme Court to secure release from state prison. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
The petitioner applied for a writ of habeas corpus asking for his release from the state prison. Upon the hearing thereon the following facts were made to appear: The crime for which the petitioner was convicted was committed on February 12, 1917. On the second day of November, 1917, by a judgment of the superior court of the county of San Joaquin, he was sentenced to suffer imprisonment in the said state prison for an indeterminate period of not less than one nor more than ten years, under the indeterminate sentence law, which had gone into effect in the month of July…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re BouchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- In Re SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- State v. Lee LimUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Emanuelli Fontánez v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.