Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1923No. 6 Div. 211PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The defendant appellant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree.. There is no recital in the bill of exceptions that it contains all of the evidence. The only questions presented for review are the refusal of charges 1, 2, and 3.

Refused charge 1 reads, as follows;

**If the minds of the jury, or a single juror, after considering the evidence, be in a state of uncertainty and confusion as to whether or not the defendant is guilty, then she should not be convicted of any offense.”

This charge was bad, in that it was calculated to impress the mind of a juror with the idea “that his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Lawman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Diamond v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Hendley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parmer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API