Rinella v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
The appeal of Samuel Rinella apparently has. been abandoned. The same counsel have appeared for each appellant, yet the only contested issues mentioned or discussed are: (1) The lack of sufficient evidence to support the verdicts as to appellants Joseph Rinella and Ingrovedo. (2) The alleged error of the court in permitting appellant Joseph Rinella to be cross-examined as to a former conviction of a crime. (3) The alleged improper argument of the district attorney before the jury.
There is substantial evidence in the record to support the following facte: On February 24,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Lefkowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Lang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Empire Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- The United States of America v. Roy PinnaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Hensley v. RoseDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
- The United States of America v. Roy PinnaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956