MacOn, Dublin & Savannah Railroad Co. v. Porter
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hewlett, Justice.
The question for decision is, where a child having a living father but no mother has been adopted by an aunt, has the relation between father and child been severed so completely as to prevent the child from recovering for the homicide?
While statutes providing that a widow or child may recover for the homicide of the husband or parent are strictly construed, because in derogation of common law, the same is true of adoption statutes taking away rights and privileges of minors. In 2 C. J. S. 374, § 6, it is said: “As the main purpose of adoption statutes is the promotion of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Magevney v. KarschTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- In re KnottTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Peeler v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Alexander v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- James v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FreelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Comer v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Sears v. MinchewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Powell v. GessnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Eig v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.