Legal Opinion

Nardis Sportswear v. Simmons

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1949No. A-1935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

This is a suit for specific performance of an option contract to purchase certain real estate, brought by Nardis Sportswear, a dissolved corporation, petitioner, by its former directors, as trustees, against John J. Simmons, respondent. The trial was to a jury, and at the conclusion of the evidence the defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict was sustained and judgment was entered that plaintiff recover nothing by its suit. An ap*611peal the Court of Civil Appeals, by a divided court, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 213 S. W. (2d) 864.

There is no controversy with regard to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McBride v. ClaytonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Henshaw v. Texas Natural Resources FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Burkburnett Refining Co. v. IlsengTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Chesnut v. Master LaboratoriesNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Rus-Ann Development, Inc. v. ECGC, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  4. Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Moore v. KirganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API