Legal Opinion
Elsnau v. Weigel
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1983No. 82-853PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole question presented by this appeal relates to an application of Civ. R. 63(B). That rule provides,
“If for any reason the judge before whom an action has been tried is unable to perform the duties to be performed by the court after a verdict is returned or findings of fact and conclusions of law are filed, another judge designated by the administrative judge, or in the case of a single-judge division by the chief justice of the supreme court, may perform those duties; but if such other judge is satisfied that he cannot perform those duties, he may in his discretion grant a new trial. ”…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Finn v. Krumroy Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Thornton v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Witt v. Akron Express, Inc., Unpublished Decision (1-14-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Tepe v. TepeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Blosser v. Beck, Unpublished Decision (8-10-1998)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.