Legal Opinion

Pagel v. Tietje

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bremer District Court. — M. F. Edwards, Judge. Action for specific performance. From a decree denying the relief prayed, the plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

— The appellee Charles Blume is the tenant of his co-appellees, and has no interest in this case, except as such tenant. The appellees H. H. Tietje and Sophie Tietje are husband and wife, and will be referred to in this opinion as though they were the sole appellees.

Prior to the 24th of -June, 1919, the said appellees were the owners of a farm of 100 acres in Bremer County, Iowa, which, at said time, they occupied as a homestead. On said date, *468the appellee H. H. Tietje entered into a written contract with the appellant, by which he agreed to sell the said farm to the appellant, and deliver…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barnett v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Engholm v. EkremNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Grice v. WoodworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Stinson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Townsend v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. FoglemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Brunsdon v. BrunsdonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Krueger v. GrothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Novotny v. HoreckaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Mill Owners Mutual Fire Insurance v. PetleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API