Legal Opinion

Adams v. Wise

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 15, 2022No. 1:21-cv-01248Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION David Adams, ) Civil Action No.: 1:21-cv-01248-JMC ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) Warden Samuel Wise, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Petitioner David Adams, proceeding pro se,1 seeks habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g) D.S.C., the matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial handling. On December 7, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (ECF No. 27) in which she recommended the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API