Legal Opinion

In re Klarman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 2011Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994. She resides in the Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County.

By decision dated October 20, 2005, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period to expire June 1, 2006 (Matter of Klarman, 22 AD3d 953 [2005]). She now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

Our examination of the papers submitted on the application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re KlarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API