Legal Opinion

Highland Park Ass'n v. Boseker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1912No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Assumpsit by the Highland Park Association against August Boseker for the use and occupation of premises. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The plaintiff is a “summer resort association,” organized under the provisions of chapter 207, 2 Comp. Laws, and amendments. The defendant is a member of the plaintiff association. This action was brought to recover the sum of $125, the price or value placed by the association upon certain concessions and privileges granted to the defendant, as will more fully appear hereafter. The case was tried before the circuit judge without a jury, and the following findings of facts and conclusions of. law were made and filed before the judgment for the plaintiff was entered:

“ Facts.
“(1) Plaintiff is a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barney v. Oyster Bay & Huntington Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Borgards v. Farmers' Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Wineland v. Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Godbout v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Dingman v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Minneapolis Society for the Blind, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Slatterly v. MadiolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Allen v. Gleaner Life Insurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Channel View East Condominium Assn Inc v. Gregory v. FergusonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API