Legal Opinion

Mercedes-Benz Group AG v. A-Z Wheels LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 2, 2020No. 3:16-cv-00875Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAIMLER AG, a German corporation, Case No.: 16-CV-875-JLS (MDD) 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, 13 DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL 14 SUMMARY JUDGMENT A-Z WHEELS LLC d/b/a 15 USARim.COM, et al., (ECF No. 120) 16 Defendants. 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Daimler AG’s Motion for Partial Summary 19 Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 120). Also before the court is Defendants A-Z Wheels LLC 20 d/b/a USArim, USArim.com, and Eurotech Wheels; Galaxy Wheels & Tires, LLC; 21 Infobahn…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API