Legal Opinion
SILIPENA v. AMERICAN PULVERIZER COMPANY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 31, 2021No. 1:16-cv-00711Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY EDWARD SILIPENA, et al., : Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No. 16-711 v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : AMERICAN PULVERIZER CO., et al., : Defendants. : This matter is before the Court on motion of Plaintiffs for Reconsideration, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(i), of the Court’s March 19, 2019 Order denying Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Upon considering the arguments set forth by the motion, the Court will deny reconsideration. “The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- NL Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. v. ShushanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.